Audience quality
Who actually follows them — age, gender, interests — and whether that overlaps with who you sell to.
Home / What we do / Influencer marketing
The part that decides whether a campaign works. Here's the whole method, including what disqualifies a creator entirely.
The six signals
This is judgement work, done by people. Data supports the decision — it doesn't make it.
Who actually follows them — age, gender, interests — and whether that overlaps with who you sell to.
Where the audience lives, city by city. For anything local, this is the deciding signal.
Not the percentage. The comments — are people asking real questions, or dropping emojis?
Whether their work would sit well next to your brand, and whether they can carry a brief without losing their voice.
Follower-growth shape, audience overlap across creators, view-to-follower ratio, disclosure history, brand safety.
The same creator can be right for a store visit and wrong for a national launch. Fit is judged per brief, not once.
On scoring. We use an internal framework — the KRATOVIX Sample Credibility Framework — to keep shortlists consistent between campaigns and between people. It is a working method, not a validated scientific model, and we will always show you the reasoning behind a rank rather than asking you to trust a number.
The difference
Outcome: content existed. Nobody knows if it worked.
Outcome: you know what worked, and why.
What disqualifies a creator
Pods, comment rings or bought engagement. Sudden follower spikes without matching view growth is the clearest signal.
If four creators on a shortlist share most of the same followers, you're paying four times to reach one audience.
A competitor promotion inside the exclusivity window, or a category the creator has previously criticised.
A pattern of undisclosed paid posts is a compliance risk that lands on your brand, not theirs.
Past content that your brand would not want to be adjacent to. Judged against your category, not a generic list.